Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €22.88 vs €161.5
- Up to 84% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i5-11600KF - €0.08 vs €0.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Forza Horizon 4 than FX-4100 - 326 vs 296 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
326
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
16%
Price, €
€161.5
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €161.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |