Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 738 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than EPYC 7551 - 120 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Naples | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
