Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 1522 days older than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 1% better in Ready or Not than EPYC 7551 - 255 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 47 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Naples | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 47 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |