Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 3132 days newer than Core i5-2400.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 8% better in Valorant than Core i5-2400 - 745 vs 692 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 95 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
692
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14712 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
155 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |