Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 1924 days newer than Core i3-4150.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-4150 - 167 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 54 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14703 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Rome | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
155 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |