Buy on Amazon
€23
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 2529 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 8% better in Resident Evil 4 than Core i3-3240 - 170 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 55 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
BQTEC Intel Core i3-3240 3.40 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 3 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processore LGA 1155
Buy for €23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14708 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rome | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 155 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
