Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 727 days older than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 155 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 2042 than EPYC 7302P - 158 vs 157 FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Rome | Codename | Whitehaven |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
