Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Memory on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory Gaming PC
- Up to 21% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1939.0 vs €2439.0
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 43% better in Starfield than Memory - 77 vs 54 FPS
- Up to 12% better value when playing Starfield than Memory - €31.68 vs €35.91 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
5th Variation
FPS
54
70.12987012987013%
Value, €/FPS
€35.91/FPS
88.22055137844612%
Price, €
€1939
100%
Buy for €1,939 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4445 minutes ago
49th Variation
FPS
77
100%
Value, €/FPS
€31.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2439
79%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,439 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4443 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
5th Variation
49th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
90.58823529411765%
49th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
96.58437605681435%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i9-12900
null-core
Single-Core
2473
79.56885456885456%
Multi-Core
13044
61.99030510407756%
49th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
null-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
Memory Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 1000 GB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
