Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory Gaming PC
- Performs up to 63% better in Dead Space than EMCA4 - 111 vs 68 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 61% cheaper than Memory - €749.0 vs €1939.0
- Up to 37% better value when playing Dead Space than Memory - €11.01 vs €17.47 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
5th Variation
FPS
111
100%
Value, €/FPS
€17.47/FPS
63.02232398397253%
Price, €
€1939
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,939 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3295 minutes ago
7th Variation
FPS
68
61.261261261261254%
Value, €/FPS
€11.01/FPS
100%
Price, €
€749
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3294 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
5th Variation
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
39.93912749408184%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
31.9534632034632%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i9-12900
null-core
Single-Core
2473
100%
Multi-Core
13044
100%
CPU Winner
7th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
null-core
Single-Core
2029
82.04609785685403%
Multi-Core
8539
65.46304814474088%
Memory Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 1000 GB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
