Key Differences
In short — Memory outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Memory Gaming PC
- Performs up to 43% better in Control than EMCA4 - 150 vs 105 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 55% cheaper than Memory - €879.0 vs €1939.0
- Up to 35% better value when playing Control than Memory - €8.37 vs €12.93 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
5th Variation
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.93/FPS
64.73317865429233%
Price, €
€1939
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,939 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3587 minutes ago
Buy for €879 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3586 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
5th Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
Radeon RX 6950 XT
16 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
41.15657761244505%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
46.64502164502164%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Core i9-12900
null-core
Single-Core
2473
100%
Multi-Core
13044
100%
CPU Winner
14th Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
null-core
Single-Core
1871
75.65709664375252%
Multi-Core
7692
58.969641214351434%
Memory Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| Radeon RX 6950 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 240 GB SSD + 1000 GB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
