Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Gaming on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Gaming is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Up to 34% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1499.00 vs €2279.00
- Up to 22% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than EMCA4 - €3.46 vs €4.43 per FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 19% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Gaming - 514 vs 433 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 456 minutes ago
Buy for €2,279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 455 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
6th Variation
35th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
33%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
47%
GPU Winner
35th Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
24 GB GDDR6 | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
479.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
959.6 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i5-13600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2747
100%
Multi-Core
15415
100%
CPU Winner
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i5-13600KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | Radeon RX 7900 XTX |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |