Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 22% better in Monster Hunter: World than EMCA4 - 176 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 15% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than EMCA4 - €8.52 vs €10.06 per FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 3% cheaper than Gaming - €1449.0 vs €1499.0
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 300 minutes ago
50th Variation
FPS
144
81.81818181818183%
Value, €/FPS
€10.06/FPS
84.69184890656064%
Price, €
€1449
100%
Buy for €1,449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 300 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
6th Variation
50th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
50th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
76.83080808080808%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
75.71365832235398%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
6th Variation
Core i5-13600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2747
100%
Multi-Core
15415
99.61227786752828%
CPU Winner
50th Variation
Core i7-13700F
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2661
96.86931197670185%
Multi-Core
15475
100%
Gaming PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i5-13600KF | CPU | Core i7-13700F |
GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |