Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the more expensive Gaming e Rendering on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 2% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Gaming e Rendering - 129 vs 126 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than Gaming e Rendering - €829.0 vs €1649.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Gaming e Rendering - €6.43 vs €13.09 per FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
126
97.67441860465115%
Value, €/FPS
€13.09/FPS
49.12146676852559%
Price, €
€1649
50%
Buy for €1,649 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55644 minutes ago
22nd Variation
FPS
129
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€829
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55644 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
72.22692633361558%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
84.2506350550381%
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
22nd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
null-core
Single-Core
2092
77.08179808400885%
Multi-Core
8659
52.71520759771094%
Gaming e Rendering PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
