Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Ankermann Business V2 Work on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 434% better in Death Stranding than Ankermann Business V2 Work - 187 vs 35 FPS
- Up to 64% better value when playing Death Stranding than Ankermann Business V2 Work - €7.48 vs €20.83 per FPS
Advantages of Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC
- Up to 48% cheaper than EMCA4 - €729.0 vs €1399.0
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
1st Variation
FPS
187
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1399
52%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78008 minutes ago
FPS
35
18.71657754010695%
Value, €/FPS
€20.83/FPS
35.90974555928949%
Price, €
€729
100%
Buy for €729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78007 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce GT 710
1 GB DDR3 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
0.7758620689655172%
Texel Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
1.0344827586206897%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
100%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce GT 710 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
