Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Ankermann Business V2 Work on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 95% better in World of Warcraft than Ankermann Business V2 Work - 158 vs 81 FPS
- Up to 42% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ankermann Business V2 Work - €5.25 vs €9.0 per FPS
Advantages of Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC
- Up to 12% cheaper than EMCA4 - €729.0 vs €829.0
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
22nd Variation
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€829
87%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73799 minutes ago
FPS
81
51.26582278481012%
Value, €/FPS
€9/FPS
58.333333333333336%
Price, €
€729
100%
Buy for €729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73802 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce GT 710
1 GB DDR3 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
1.371718882303133%
Texel Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
2.743437764606266%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
22nd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
3.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2092
100%
Multi-Core
8659
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 5 5600X | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce GT 710 |
32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |