Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper RG Digital Pc on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 3350% better in Starfield than RG Digital Pc - 69 vs 2 FPS
- Up to 91% better value when playing Starfield than RG Digital Pc - €31.87 vs €350.0 per FPS
Advantages of RG Digital Pc Desktop PC
- Up to 68% cheaper than EMCA4 - €699.99 vs €2199.0
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
5th Variation
FPS
69
100%
Value, €/FPS
€31.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2199
31%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
FPS
2
2.898550724637681%
Value, €/FPS
€350/FPS
9.105714285714287%
Price, €
€699.99
100%
Buy for €699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
280.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
761.5 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
18.987883107626512%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
12.24425476034143%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
5th Variation
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
4.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2719
100%
Multi-Core
15172
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | RG Digital Pc Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CPU | Core i5-11400 |
| GeForce RTX 4080 | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
16 GB | RAM | 4 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
