Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 79% better in Dead Space than Megaport - 111 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 8% better value when playing Dead Space than Megaport - €12.6 vs €13.69 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 39% cheaper than EMCA4 - €849.0 vs €1399.0
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
FPS
111
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1399
60%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
44th Variation
FPS
62
55.85585585585585%
Value, €/FPS
€13.69/FPS
92.03798392987582%
Price, €
€849
100%
Buy for €849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 322 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
44th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
44th Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
40.85249042145593%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
31.768837803320565%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | GPU | GeForce RTX 3060 |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
