Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper PCSpecialist Prism on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 58% better in Dead Space than PCSpecialist Prism - 79 vs 50 FPS
- Up to 23% better value when playing Dead Space than PCSpecialist Prism - €12.27 vs €15.98 per FPS
Advantages of PCSpecialist Prism PC
- Up to 18% cheaper than EMCA4 - €799.0 vs €969.0
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
38th Variation
FPS
79
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€969
82%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €969 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 838 minutes ago
1st Variation
FPS
50
63.29113924050633%
Value, €/FPS
€15.98/FPS
76.78347934918648%
Price, €
€799
100%
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 840 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
38th Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
38th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
46.721446179129%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
41.24129930394431%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
38th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
3.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2092
100%
Multi-Core
8659
100%
CPU Winner
1st Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1871
89.43594646271511%
Multi-Core
7692
88.83242868691535%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | PCSpecialist Prism PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
