Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Ankermann Business V2 Work on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 571% better in Sea of Thieves than Ankermann Business V2 Work - 282 vs 42 FPS
- Up to 29% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Ankermann Business V2 Work - €12.41 vs €17.36 per FPS
Advantages of Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC
- Up to 79% cheaper than EMCA4 - €729.0 vs €3499.0
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
3rd Variation
FPS
282
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€3499
20%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €3,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74418 minutes ago
FPS
42
14.893617021276595%
Value, €/FPS
€17.36/FPS
71.48617511520737%
Price, €
€729
100%
Buy for €729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74417 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce GT 710
1 GB DDR3 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
0.3652762119503946%
Texel Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
0.5023255813953489%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Ryzen 9 7950X
4.5 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2938
100%
Multi-Core
19293
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce GT 710 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
