Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Sedatech on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Sedatech is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Sedatech - 139 vs 135 FPS
Advantages of Sedatech PC
- Up to 6% cheaper than EMCA4 - €3394.9 vs €3599.0
- Up to 3% better value when playing Elden Ring than EMCA4 - €25.15 vs €25.89 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €3,599 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
Buy for €3,394.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
3rd Variation
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
64%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
63%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3108
100%
Multi-Core
21042
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Sedatech PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 9 7950X | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |