Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Gaming outperforms the more expensive EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 0% better in World of Tanks than EMCA4 - 592 vs 590 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than EMCA4 - €3399.0 vs €3499.0
- Up to 3% better value when playing World of Tanks than EMCA4 - €5.74 vs €5.93 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
FPS
590
99.66216216216216%
Value, €/FPS
€5.93/FPS
96.79595278246207%
Price, €
€3499
97%
Buy for €3,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74088 minutes ago
Buy for €3,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74088 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Ryzen 9 7950X
4.5 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2938
98.78950907868192%
Multi-Core
19293
95.7564026206075%
1st Variation
Core i9-13900K
3.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2974
100%
Multi-Core
20148
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X | CPU | Core i9-13900K |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4090 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
