Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce GTX 960 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 2554 days newer than GeForce GTX 960.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 350% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 960 - 9 vs 2 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 - 50 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 - 4 vs 2 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GeForce GTX 960
Desktop • Jan 22nd, 2015
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 960
Desktop • Jan 22nd, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
37.7 GPixel/s
50%
Texel Fillrate
75.39 GTexel/s
67%
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 22nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| GeForce 900 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| $199 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
112.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| 1127 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| 1178 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1753 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
