Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 2337 days older than Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 50 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 14% better in F1 22 than Radeon Pro W6400 - 83 vs 73 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
43%
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| Radeon Pro | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | HBM |
| 64-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 2331 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
