Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 2848 days older than Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 4 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 118% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Radeon Pro W6400 - 85 vs 39 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 19 vs 50 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
FPS
85
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €79.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 | vs | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2014 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 10.67 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 625 MHz |
2331 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 667 MHz |