Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce GTX 950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 2344 days newer than GeForce GTX 950.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 21% better in No Man's Sky than GeForce GTX 950 - 88 vs 73 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 - 50 vs 90 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 - 4 vs 2 GB
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 950
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 950
Desktop • Aug 20th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
38.02 GPixel/s
50%
Texel Fillrate
57.02 GTexel/s
50%
Radeon Pro W6400
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 20th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| GeForce 900 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| $159 | MSRP | Not Available |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
| 105.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| 1024 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| 1188 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
| 1653 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
