Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is 1046 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
- Performs up to 14% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 111 vs 97 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 35 vs 50 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
97
87%
Value, €/FPS
€2.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€198
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €198 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
40%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
40%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
None | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
1380 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1515 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |