Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB is 290 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Performs up to 42% better in HITMAN 3 than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 84 vs 59 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 3 vs 2 GB
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
23.78628933886314%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
31.715447154471544%
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
81.98 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
123 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 18th, 2016 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 10 |
$149 | MSRP | $199 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1506 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1708 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2002 MHz |