Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 688 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 35 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 900% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 10 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
10
100%
Value, €/FPS
€15.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€156.3
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €156.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
36%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
41%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$149 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |