Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 2100 outperforms HD Graphics 610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 2100 is 278 days newer than HD Graphics 610.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 610
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 5 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Performs up to 16% better in Need For Speed Unbound than HD Graphics 610 - 37 vs 32 FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
HD Graphics 610
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
HD Graphics 610
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
1.8 GPixel/s
9%
Texel Fillrate
10.8 GTexel/s
27%
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
Intel HD Graphics 610 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 64-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
