Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 260 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 260 is 1265 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260
- Performs up to 1% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 98 vs 97 FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Radeon R7 260
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
81%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 17th, 2013 |
| Radeon Pro | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $149 | MSRP | $109 |
| 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| 925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
