Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms HD Graphics 610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 929 days older than HD Graphics 610.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 610
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 5 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 2% better in War Thunder than HD Graphics 610 - 212 vs 207 FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
HD Graphics 610
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
HD Graphics 610
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
1.8 GPixel/s
6%
Texel Fillrate
10.8 GTexel/s
18%
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel HD Graphics 610 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
