Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1268 days older than the cheaper Arc A310.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Up to 21% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - €127.5 vs €162.0
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 30 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 8% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Arc A310 - 68 vs 63 FPS
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Buy for €127.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74364 minutes ago
Buy for €162 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74365 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
52.552552552552555%
Texel Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
60.06006006006006%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |