Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3050 outperforms the cheaper Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Arc A310 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce RTX 3050 is 281 days older than the cheaper Arc A310.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Up to 51% cheaper than GeForce RTX 3050 - €116.44 vs €239.5
- Up to 22% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than GeForce RTX 3050 - €2.38 vs €3.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 - 30 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050
- Performs up to 59% better in The Outer Worlds than Arc A310 - 78 vs 49 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than Intel Arc A310 - 8 vs 4 GB
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €116.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
78
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.07/FPS
77%
Price, €
€239.5
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €239.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1552 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1777 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |