Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A770 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A770 is 1268 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of Arc A770
- Performs up to 118% better in Alan Wake 2 than GeForce GTX 1650 - 74 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 42% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than GeForce GTX 1650 - €4.39 vs €7.56 per FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 16 vs 4 GB
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Arc A770 - 75 vs 225 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
74
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€324.99
79%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €324.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Buy for €257 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
17%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
15%
Arc A770 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$329 | MSRP | $149 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
2100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |