Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A750 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A750 is 1268 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 75 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Arc A750
- Performs up to 20% better in Counter-Strike 2 than GeForce GTX 1650 - 444 vs 370 FPS
- Up to 17% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than GeForce GTX 1650 - €0.49 vs €0.59 per FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 8 vs 4 GB
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €216.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7646 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
444
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€218.74
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €218.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8452 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
20%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
17%
GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Alchemist |
$149 | MSRP | $289 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |