Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 647 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 68% better in Stray than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 69 vs 41 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 35 vs 175 Watts
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
41
59%
Value, €/FPS
€4.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€198
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €198 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
30%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
15%
AMD Radeon R9 Nano | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
Pirate Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$649 | MSRP | $149 |
1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
HBM | Type | GDDR5 |
4096-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |