Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 1188 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 25% better in Alan Wake 2 than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 25 vs 20 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 3 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 35 vs 200 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
20
80%
Value, €/FPS
€9.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€198
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €198 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15694 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
65%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
37%
AMD Radeon R9 280 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$279 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
384-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
240 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
827 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
933 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |