Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 270X outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 270X is 1335 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 270X
- Performs up to 15% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 31 vs 27 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 270X - 35 vs 180 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
FPS
27
87%
Value, €/FPS
€7.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€198
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €198 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
58%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
46%
AMD Radeon R9 270X | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$199 | MSRP | $149 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
2x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
179.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1050 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
1400 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |