Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon 780M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1352 days older than Radeon 780M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon 780M
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 15 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 13% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Radeon 780M - 51 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon 780M - 4 vs 0 GB
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
51
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€244
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €244 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Integrated • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Jan 4th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
92.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
139.2 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
57%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
67%
AMD Radeon 780M | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Navi III IGP | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
2900 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |