Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700G outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700G is 1758 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700G - £49.95 vs £149.00
- Up to 63% better value when playing Saints Row than Ryzen 7 5700G - £0.32 vs £0.87 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700G
- Performs up to 10% better in Saints Row than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 171 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
156
91%
Value, £/FPS
£0.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £49.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Buy for £149 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700G |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Cezanne |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |