Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1357 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L v5.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1260L v5
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 219 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
219
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.46/FPS
100%
Price, £
£101.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £101.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6362 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1260L v5 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |