Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 2644 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L v5.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1260L v5
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 17% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 217 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E3-1260L v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Ryzen 5 7600
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1260L v5 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
