Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 560 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 454 vs 427 FPS
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £70.97 vs £2087.72
- Up to 97% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £0.16 vs £4.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 58 vs 280 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
427
94%
Value, £/FPS
£4.89/FPS
3%
Price, £
£2087.72
3%
Buy for £2,087.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
454
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.16/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £70.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 264 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 58 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |