Buy on Amazon
£2,087.72
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP $2749
Availability
MSRP $2749
AvailabilityMSRP $549
Availability
MSRP $549
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 114 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 64 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 15% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 71 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £204.00 vs £2087.72
- Up to 91% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £2.87 vs £33.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 105 vs 280 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
62
87%
Value, £/FPS
£33.67/FPS
9%
Price, £
£2087.72
9%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX (32C/64T, 144 MB Cache, up to 4.2 GHz Max Boost)
Buy for £2,087.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
Ryzen 9 5900X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
71
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.87/FPS
100%
Price, £
£204
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen™ 9 5900X Desktop Processor
Buy for £204 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 265 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Ryzen 9 5900X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Vermeer |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 12 |
64 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
