Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 114 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 64 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 385 vs 375 FPS
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £295.00 vs £2087.72
- Up to 86% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - £0.77 vs £5.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 105 vs 280 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
375
97%
Value, £/FPS
£5.57/FPS
14%
Price, £
£2087.72
14%
Buy for £2,087.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
385
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.77/FPS
100%
Price, £
£295
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 16 |
64 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |