Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1608 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 181 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 58 vs 180 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
181
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |