Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 1587 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 6% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 191 vs 180 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
191
100%
Value, £/FPS
£13.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£2511.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £2,511.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |