Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1952 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 9% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 316 vs 290 FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
