Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Xeon X5690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3683 days newer than Xeon X5690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 60% better in War Thunder than Xeon X5690 - 215 vs 134 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon X5690 - 65 vs 130 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
215
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.55/FPS
100%
Price, £
£117.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £117.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5690 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |