Buy on Amazon
£69.89
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3683 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon X5675 - 188 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.37/FPS
100%
Price, £
£69.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10105F 10th Generation - Desktop processor (3.7 GHz Tuboboost: 4.4 GHz, 4 cores, LGA1200) BX8070110105F
Buy for £69.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon X5675
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
